Monday, October 19, 2009


This went to ASAP a little while ago. The method is interesting, and apparently successful, but the thing I liked most about it was one of the footnotes.

It's a bit unfortunate that a good method needs to be supported for not being catalytic, or any other little darling of the day, but it's nice to see it done once in a while.

It seems like most people who use buzzwords, especially in the title of the article, really do the buzzword in question a disservice, and it has little to do with the method besides poor advertising.

1 comment:

Mike said...

Love the cost analysis. I will march this down the hall immediately.